Second rates prevailing in litigation with Gucci

  Gucci can not feel very "Gucci" by the recent decision of infringement of copyright guess in their epic battle with.

Although the Italian luxury brand has won the first court decision in New York for $ 4.7 million on a diamond-G logo that resembled nothing so much as a model Gucci, can guess the last word - for the moment at least.

In a surprising decision of the Italian court, three of the hallmarks of Gucci in Milan were filed on the basis of a counterclaim of Guess in 2009, it was canceled.

This means that the diamond pattern Gucci G logo and "Flora" pattern marks were canceled so that the models open for anyone to use a G logo in one of these signature schemes.

It seems a little extreme for a court to completely cancel three signature models, which has been used for years the brand. Moreover, the decision feels like sabotage a brand name like Gucci, have the models with the quality of their products.

Paul Marciano, CEO of Guess, said the ongoing legal battle with a simple phone call and tactics can be solved Gucci was "nothing less than bullying." He continued: "Because of its infinite resources, Gucci forum shopping in the world, expand to try to stop the accessories business success rates was This is fundamentally wrong and unreasonable.."

We find it interesting that Paul Marciano Gucci to be at fault, but sees no problem with his blatant copying of another business enterprise designs. Gucci has always pending litigation against rates in China and France, then this whole ordeal is not over yet ... Stay tuned.